Jump to content
 

Sign in to follow this  
maximus

Noutati in domeniul auto

Recommended Posts

Nissan Skyline GTR proto - 2005

 

La al 37-lea Salon Auto de la Tokyo, Nissan a anuntat debutul noului Skyline GT-R pentru 2007. Si a prezentat acest prototip.

Daca ar fi vorba de vreun alt producator, poate ca n-ar trebui luat prea in serios prototipul, dar, data fiind traditia celor de la Nissan de a-si indeplini promisiunile, si dat fiind faptul ca acest prototip pare destul de realist, am putea spune ca asa va arata viitorul GT-R. Probabil ca pana in productia de serie va pierde unele detalii, cum ar fi masca din fibra de carbon sau extractorul aerodinamic din acelasu material, dar.. ramane de vazut.

Detalii despre partea tehnica nu au fost inca furnizate oficial, dar zvonurile spun ca va fi vorba de un V6 de 3.2 litri ce va dezvolta 480 CP. La Nurburgring a fost fotografiat saptamanile trecute un Infiniti G35 Coupe puternic modificat, in mod evident un test-car. Si, din ceea ce s-a aflat, platforma in testare sub acea caroserie era cea a viitorului GT-R. Deci, primul GT-R complet nou din ultimii 8 ani se apropie de realitate.

post-285-1129799502_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post

Producatorul Mitsubishi Motors a anuntat oficial ca noua generatie Outlander a fost lansata in vanzare in showroomurile din Japonia saptamana trecuta, simultan cu prezentarea acestui model la Salonul de la Tokeu. In Europa, noul Outlander va ajunge anul viitor. Automobilul se mandreste cu o platforma noua (ce va fi folosita si de alte branduri europene), cu o rigiditate sporita, conceputa pentru a rezista mai bine in timpul accidentelor, dar si cu motorul 2,4 MIVEC, mai puternic si mai economic, o cutie in 6 trepte si transmisie 4WD, controlata electronic.

Printre elementele constructive ce se remarca la noul model se numara si acoperisul de aluminiu, sistemul anti-soc mono-tub din zona spoilerului spate si alte inovatii tehnologice testate pe modelele Lancer Evo. La interior va fi disponibil sistemul de sapte scaune Smart X Sport (5 plus doua rabatabile din podea). Atat motorul, cat si caroseria vor fi produse in uzinele Mitsubishi din Japonia.

Designul Outlander a fost premiat anul acesta cu „Good Design Award“ in cadrul concursului anual organizat de industria japoneza.

 

http://www.sfin.ro/articol_2925/noul_outla...a_la_tokeu.html

 

2005101413511.gif

 

Alte detalii in limba engleza aici:

http://media.mitsubishi-motors.com/pressre...detail1351.html

 

________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________

 

 

Alte noutati in care este implicat noul Outlander:

 

For the first time, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has evaluated vehicles in side impact crash tests to provide consumer information. The best performers among the 12 small SUVs tested (2003 models) are the Subaru Forester and the Ford Escape with optional side airbags. In contrast, 7 other small SUVs earned the lowest rating of poor -- the Escape without optional side airbags, Toyota RAV4, Suzuki Grand Vitara/Vitara/Chevrolet Tracker, Land Rover Freelander, Mitsubishi Outlander, Saturn VUE, and Honda Element. The Jeep Wrangler and Honda CR-V are rated marginal, and the Hyundai Santa Fe is acceptable.

 

The Subaru Forester is the only one of the 12 small SUVs to earn a good rating in not only the side impact crashworthiness evaluation but also the Institute's frontal offset crash test.

 

The Institute's side impact crash test represents what happens when a passenger vehicle is struck by a pickup truck or SUV.

The side impact test represents what happens when a passenger vehicle is struck in the side by a pickup truck or SUV at about 30 mph. The results of this test expand the Institute's testing programs for consumer information. For eight years the Institute has been providing comparative rankings of passenger vehicles based on performance in frontal offset crash tests at 40 mph. Now most new passenger vehicles are being designed to earn good ratings in this test.

 

"Our side impact crash test is severe," says Institute president Brian O'Neill. "Given the designs of today's vehicles, it's unlikely that people in real-world crashes as severe as this test would emerge uninjured. But with good side impact protection, people should be able to survive crashes of this severity without serious injuries."

 

O'Neill adds that he expects this new crashworthiness evaluation program to influence consumers' car-buying choices. "This is what happened with our frontal crash test results, and now we expect consumers will use the new test results to help them choose vehicles with good occupant protection in both front and side impacts."

Because consumers pay attention to the Institute's crash test results, automakers are expected to upgrade their vehicles' side impact protection, just as they've upgraded the protection their vehicles offer in frontal crashes.

 

"Ideally, passenger vehicles should be good performers in both tests -- a double good," O'Neill says.

 

The configuration of the Institute's side impact test is a 31 mph perpendicular impact into the driver side of a passenger vehicle. The moving deformable barrier that strikes the test vehicle weighs 3,300 pounds and has a front end shaped to simulate the typical front end of a pickup or SUV. In each side-struck vehicle are two instrumented dummies, one in the driver seat and one in the rear seat behind the driver. These dummies are the size of a short (5th percentile) female or a 12-year-old child.

 

"This is the first U.S. consumer information test program to use a dummy that represents small females," O'Neill points out.

 

Forester is best performer and Outlander is worst: The side airbag in the Subaru Forester kept the injury measures recorded on the driver dummy relatively low. The dummy in the rear seat also recorded relatively low measures, although its head did hit the pillar behind the back door -- an area required by federal standard to limit head impact forces. There was somewhat less intrusion into the Forester than into several of the other small SUVs the Institute tested.

 

In contrast, the Mitsubishi Outlander was the worst performer in the side impact test. There was more intrusion into the occupant compartment than in many of the other vehicles tested. The Outlander that was tested didn't have side airbags. The barrier struck the driver dummy's head, and the injury measures recorded on the head as well as on the torso and pelvis were very high.

 

Ford Escape with and without side airbags: Ford offers side airbags as optional equipment in the front seats of Escapes. The Institute tested Escapes with and without this option.

 

"There was a huge difference in the results," O'Neill says. "The driver dummy with the airbag to protect its head and torso recorded low injury measures, while high measures were recorded on the driver dummy in the Escape without side airbags. Even though the Escape with side airbags was a good performer in this test, it was only marginal in our frontal offset test."

 

Relative importance of side impacts: Today's passenger vehicles are more crashworthy than they used to be, especially in frontal crashes. As occupant protection in frontal crashes improves, the relative importance of protecting people in side impacts increases. From the early 1980s until 2000, car driver death rates decreased from 164 to 87 per million cars registered. This represents a 47 percent decline. Most of this improvement was in frontal crashes, in which driver death rates decreased from 86 to 41 per million (52 percent decline). The improvement was much smaller in side impacts -- the death rate decreased from 42 to 32 per million (24 percent decline).

In crashes with another passenger vehicle, 51 percent of driver deaths in recent model cars during 2000-01 occurred in side impacts, up from 31 percent in 1980-81. During the same time, the proportion of deaths in frontal impacts declined from 61 percent to 43 percent.

 

These changes are attributable to two effects. There have been significant improvements in frontal crash protection -- standard airbags, improved structural designs, and higher belt use rates, for example. At the same time, growing sales of SUVs and pickups have exacerbated height mismatches among passenger vehicles, thereby increasing the risks to occupants of many vehicles struck in the side. Seventy-one percent of the driver deaths in cars struck on the driver side by other passenger vehicles during 1980-81 occurred when the other vehicle was a car. Twenty-nine percent occurred when the striking vehicle was a pickup or SUV. By 2000-01 these percentages had almost reversed -- 57 percent of the driver deaths in cars struck on the driver side by another passenger vehicle involved striking SUVs or pickups, while 43 percent involved striking cars.

 

Head protection in side impacts: Almost 10,000 passenger vehicle occupants die each year in side impacts, and head injuries are a leading cause. Side airbags designed specifically to protect the head can reduce such deaths and the even more numerous nonfatal head injuries that occur in side impacts.

 

Both of the small SUVs with good overall ratings in the Institute's side impact test are equipped with side airbags designed to protect the heads of front-seat occupants. These are standard on the Subaru Forester and optional on the Ford Escape. The Hyundai Santa Fe, which also has standard side airbags with head protection, earned an acceptable rating. In contrast, none of the seven small SUVs with poor ratings is equipped with standard side airbags designed to protect the head.

 

(Note: The Saturn VUE does have an optional inflatable curtain, but when side airbags are optional the Institute tests vehicles without this option. If a manufacturer selling optional side airbags requests the Institute to conduct an additional test of a vehicle with this option and agrees to reimburse the cost of the vehicle, a second test is conducted. General Motors didn't request such a test for the VUE, but Ford did request a test of the Escape with optional side airbags. The Honda CR-V and Mitsubishi Outlander have optional side airbags to protect the thorax, but neither manufacturer requested a second test with this option.)

 

None of the small SUVs the Institute recently tested has side airbags to protect the heads of people riding in rear seats. (The VUE's optional head airbag system does cover the rear seating position. However, as noted above the Institute didn't test this vehicle.)

 

Availability of side airbags: More and more manufacturers are offering side airbags as standard or optional equipment, and some cars and larger SUVs are being equipped with newer inflatable curtains designed to protect rear-seat occupants' heads.

 

According to a recent J.D. Power survey of 50,000 people, 34 percent said they "definitely want" side airbags, up from 18 percent in 1997 (2002 Feature Contenting Report). Another J.D. Power survey reveals side airbags at the top of the list of 19 vehicle features respondents said they want. Still, reported sales of optional side airbags are low.

 

The three factors evaluated in the Institute's side impact test -- driver and passenger injury measures, head protection, and structural performance -- determine each vehicle's overall side crashworthiness evaluation. The order in which vehicles are listed depends on performance in frontal offset crash tests as well as side impact tests.

 

http://www.roadandtravel.com/crashratings/...ashratings.html

Edited by nrares

Share this post


Link to post

honda mi se pare super misto, dar ce sa mai zic de chevrolet :) >- , iar nisanul lasa de dorit :P

Share this post


Link to post

Te simţi nesigur la volan?

post-1320-1131025210_thumb.jpg

post-1320-1131025217_thumb.jpg

post-1320-1131025224_thumb.jpg

post-1320-1131025232_thumb.jpg

post-1320-1131025240_thumb.jpg

post-1320-1131025250_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post

Am vazut chestia de mai sus live, dar fara modificarile sasiului. Adica, pe rotile ei normale. Era arhisuficient de impresionanta si asa :)

Share this post


Link to post

O sa fie primul suv compact cu motor diesel de la Chevy.

Acelasi motor diesel o sa fie pus pe Lacetti. 150CP cu consum redus pe Lacetti  <img src= ">

Share this post


Link to post

Uau, arata super SUV-ul Chevy...Daca o sa vina si cu un pret rezonabil... Oricum sper ca urmatoarea mea masina sa fie un SUV...

Share this post


Link to post

alx de ce asa rautacios ? interiorul e super...

mie imi place foarte mult conceptul s3x. am ramas mut...cand l-am vazut.

ce faruri superbe are...

nu mai tin minte de unde stiu...dar pretul ar porni de la aprx 20 mii euro cip

EDIT : uitati si poze...ce volan are... @-)

post-851-1133211441_thumb.jpg

post-851-1133211452_thumb.jpg

post-851-1133211606_thumb.jpg

post-851-1133211615_thumb.jpg

post-851-1133211864_thumb.jpg

Edited by zack

Share this post


Link to post

Ce-mi place la el este ca abordeaza o linie destul de decenta. Chiar nu este o masina de senzatie ceea ce pe mine ma bucura.

Share this post


Link to post

nu-s rautacios...

nu-mi plac:

1. tetierele

2. volanul

3. bordul (neuniform, necompact)

4. schimbatorul

5. insertiile de lemn.

6. ceasurile de bord.

 

imi place in schimb designul exterior.

Share this post


Link to post

Gandeste-te la masivitatea designului si finisajul interior ale SUVurilor americane si o sa te indragostesti de asta. Daewoo aduce cel putin un plus la capitolul design GM-ului.

Share this post


Link to post

mi se pare super noul chevrolet captiva. e super si exterior si interior, iar bordul e chiar super. in exterior seamna putin la forma cu ML-ul nou...nu vi se pare?

Share this post


Link to post

spy shoturi...cu chevy TOSCA ( oare va inlocui evanda...nu ?)

la bord,aduce cu opel...

post-173-1133691454_thumb.jpg

post-173-1133691497_thumb.jpg

post-173-1133691892_thumb.jpg

Edited by Wolfman

Share this post


Link to post

Cam aduce ceva din aerul ei cu Nissan Primera, spatele la cea aurie sau ceva din Meganul 1 la cea albă. Oare mi se pare?

Edited by Florinut

Share this post


Link to post

in sfarsit un chevy cu computer de bord. erau cam in urma cu faza asta. in 2005 masina de peste 15000 euro fara computer de bord.au un punct in plus de la mine :) >-

Share this post


Link to post

inca o poza cu bordul mai de-aproape.

imi lace foarte mult volanul !!

post-173-1133935586_thumb.jpg

Edited by Wolfman

Share this post


Link to post
nu mai tin minte de unde stiu...dar pretul ar porni de la aprx 20 mii euro cip

Ieri am fost la dealer (GTT) si mi-am ridicat masina. Am intrebat pasager si de frumusetea din imagine (Captiva) si am aflat ca au fost comandate citeva exemplare (pot fi numarate pe degetele de la o mina) si vor veni in tara de anul viitor. Primele motoare sunt doar cele pe benzina si pretul va porni de pe la 18.000 (CIP, evident), dar nu stia sigur.

Edited by mad_hindu

Share this post


Link to post

Zack, tata, fii si tu mai atent la ce atasezi. Inteleg nevoia de viteza, suntem in secolul 21 (adica te grabesti sa scrii mesajul), da' totusi BMP-ul ala are 2 mega! Daca-l transformai in JPG ar fi iesit de 180kb (cu compresie de 85%).

 

Gandeste-te asa: daca-l converteai in JPG, pierdeai nitel timp cu conversia, dar cistigai la upload si la trafic, + ca era si la ceilalti mai usor la download (eu unul nu m-as fi obosit sa descarc doi mega de poza daca n-as fi vrut sa-ti explic ce-ti explic) + ca ti-ar fi afisat thumbnail pe forum + ca ocupai mai putin spatiu pe server.

Share this post


Link to post

Mie exact volanul mi se pare jalnic. Si ceasurile de bord.

 

In schimb, restul bordului e misto, multe botoane...

Share this post


Link to post
Zack, tata, fii si tu mai atent la ce atasezi. Inteleg nevoia de viteza, suntem in secolul 21 (adica te grabesti sa scrii mesajul), da' totusi BMP-ul ala are 2 mega! Daca-l transformai in JPG ar fi iesit de 180kb (cu compresie de 85%).

 

Gandeste-te asa: daca-l converteai in JPG, pierdeai nitel timp cu conversia, dar cistigai la upload si la trafic, + ca era si la ceilalti mai usor la download (eu unul nu m-as fi obosit sa descarc doi mega de poza daca n-as fi vrut sa-ti explic ce-ti explic) + ca ti-ar fi afisat thumbnail pe forum + ca ocupai mai putin spatiu pe server.

nu mi-am dat seama...sa al convertesc,pe viitor asa o sa fac.

poze :

post-851-1133949088_thumb.jpg

post-851-1133949118_thumb.jpg

post-851-1133949128_thumb.jpg

post-851-1133949146_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post

Pe bune? Ce sacrilegiu...

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

 

×
×
  • Create New...